September 18, 2026

US Defense Secretary Hegseth's broker looked to buy defence fund before Iran attack, FT reports

Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said on X the story was "entirely false and fabricated" and demanded a retraction

US Defense Secretary Hegseth's broker looked to buy defence fund before Iran attack, FT reports
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth holds a briefing with Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Dan Caine, amid the US-Israeli war on Iran, at the Pentagon in Washington, DC, US, Mar 19, 2026. REUTERS/Evan Vucci

bdnews24.com

Reuters

Published : 31 Mar 2026, 04:09 PM

Updated : 21 Aug 2026, 03:32 PM

A broker for US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth attempted to make a big investment in major defence companies in the weeks leading up to the US-Israeli attack on Iran, the Financial Times reported on Monday, citing three people familiar with the matter.

Chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said on X the story was "entirely false and fabricated" and demanded a retraction.

The FT report said Hegseth's broker at Morgan Stanley contacted BlackRock in February, about making a multimillion-dollar investment in the asset manager's Defense Industrials Active ETF, shortly before the US launched military action against Tehran.

According to the FT report, the investment discussed by Hegseth’s broker did not ultimately go ahead as the fund, which launched in May last year, was not yet available for Morgan Stanley clients to buy.

The FT report did not say how much discretion the broker had to make investments on Hegseth's behalf, or whether Hegseth knew what the broker was doing.

"Neither Secretary Hegseth nor any of his representatives approached BlackRock about any such investment," Parnell said.

BlackRock declined to comment on the report, while Morgan Stanley did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment.

The report on the investment attempt comes amid a wider scrutiny of trades made in financial and prediction markets ahead of US President Donald Trump's major policy decisions.

Some of these decisions have been preceded by well-timed bets, leading some experts to raise questions about whether information had somehow leaked ahead of time.

Related Stories