Published : 10 Nov 2014, 09:57 PM
The recount, overseen by a judge, was said to have been done under strict secrecy last week, reports Britain’s The Telegraph.
The scrutiny was undertaken after the election result was legally challenged following widespread allegations of irregularities, intimidation and fraud, Andrew Gilligan of the paper said.
Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has been quoted to have described Rahman as a “medieval monarch” steeped in a “culture of cronyism”. He had earlier described Tower Hamlets as a “rotten borough”.
The scrutiny of votes cast in Rahman’s favour done last week by court officials has now revealed irregularities that match the allegations.
“There was a significant number of Mr Rahman’s bundles where there were fewer than 50 votes for him in the bundle, or votes for other candidates in the bundle,” the newspaper quotes an official in the know as saying.
“There was also a significant number of ballot papers where a vote for John Biggs [Mr Rahman’s Labour opponent] had been crossed out and a vote for Rahman written in. Almost all the irregularities favoured Rahman,” the official said.
Biggs had lost to Rahman in July by 3,250 votes but had alleged ballot manipulation, especially the postal ones, claiming there were reasons for suspicion about their integrity.
A cross-party group of six Tower Hamlets voters have alleged intimidation and fraudulent voting.
They say that voting stations were besieged by Rahman’s supporters and many voters, especially women, were “accompanied” to the polling booths and “directed” how to cast their ballot.
What is more, the allegation is that many had found their votes had already been cast when they reached the booth.
The counting of the votes in May had seen the fortunes of candidates swing.
Sanu Miah, a Labour council candidate in the St Peter’s ward, emerged on top after the first count with 2,270 votes.