Judge rules Musk's tweets over taking Tesla private were false, investors say
>> Reuters
Published: 17 Apr 2022 12:17 PM BdST Updated: 17 Apr 2022 12:17 PM BdST
-
Elon Musk attends the opening ceremony of the new Tesla Gigafactory for electric cars in Gruenheide, Germany, Mar 22, 2022. Patrick Pleul/REUTERS/File
A federal judge has ruled that Tesla CEO Elon Musk's 2018 tweets about having secured financing to take the company private were false, according to court filings by Tesla investors suing the billionaire over the tweets.
The filing said that the court ruled Apr 1 that Musk's 2018 tweets were "false and misleading." The court "held that he recklessly made the statements with knowledge as to their falsity," it said.
Investors in the electric car maker asked in the filing, submitted on Friday, for US District Court Judge Edward Chen to block the celebrity entrepreneur from his "public campaign to present a contradictory and false narrative regarding" his 2018 tweets.
Musk on Thursday claimed that funding actually had been secured to take Tesla private in 2018. He settled with US securities regulators over what the agency found to be false statements, paying fines and agreeing to have a lawyer approve some of his tweets before posting them.
That Apr 1 decision was not listed on the court docket.
The issues will be at the center of a May jury trial in which the investors are seeking damages over the tweets.
Musk "has used his fame and notoriety to sway public opinion in his favor, waging battle in the press having been defeated in the courtroom," the filing said.
Musk’s latest comments risk confusing potential jurors and prejudicing a jury decision on the amount of damages owed by Musk, it said.
Musk is trying to nullify his settlement with the SEC, accusing the agency of harassing him with investigations.
Alex Spiro, a lawyer for Musk and Tesla, on Saturday again asserted that it was true that Musk was considering taking Tesla private in 2018 and had financing for that move. “All that’s left some half decade later is random plaintiffs’ lawyers trying to make a buck and others trying to block that truth from coming to light, all to the detriment of free speech,” he said.
The case is In re Tesla Inc Securities
Litigation, US District Court, Northern District of California
-
WhatsApp introduces commercial services
-
Canada to ban Huawei/ZTE 5G equipment
-
Chinese hackers tried to steal Russian defence data
-
Google 'private browsing' mode not really private: Texas lawsuit
-
What’s down the road for silicon?
-
Twitter defends count of spam accounts after Musk criticism
-
FBI sought Pegasus tools from Israel
-
Google offers a more modest vision of the future
-
WhatsApp introduces commercial services as parent company Meta seeks fresh revenue
-
Canada to ban Huawei/ZTE 5G equipment, joining Five Eyes allies
-
Chinese hackers tried to steal Russian defence data: report
-
Google 'private browsing' mode not really private, Texas lawsuit says
-
What’s down the road for silicon?
-
Twitter CEO defends company's count of spam accounts after Musk criticism
Most Read
- Woman attacked at Bangladesh railway station for her outfit
- Bangladesh Bank devalues taka again as US dollar hits record high
- Slowly but steadily, Sylhet flooding begins to improve
- WHO calls emergency meeting as monkeypox cases cross 100 in Europe
- Moscow moves to Russify seized Ukraine land, signalling annexation
- China quietly increases purchases of low-priced Russian oil
- BRICS-led New Development Bank to set up regional office in India
- Liverpool is latest on the list of Chattogram’s direct freight routes
- Exhausted, weak wild elephant prefers to stay close to humans
- Dollar surges past Tk 100, but still ‘hard to find’