Human Rights Watch accuses Bangladesh government of cracking down on free speech, opposition in 2015

Bangladesh is again facing the brunt of Human Rights Watch’s criticism as it says freedom of expression came under ‘severe attack’ in Bangladesh in 2015.

In its World Report 2016, the New York-based NGO says the government cracked down on media and civil society activists, initiated contempt of court proceedings and prosecuted them under ‘vague and overbroad laws’.

All this happened while secular bloggers and foreign aid workers became the target of extremist groups, it added.

In the 659-page report, the HRW has reviewed human-rights practices in more than 90 countries.

In the introduction, Executive Director Kenneth Roth writes that “authoritarian governments throughout the world, fearful of peaceful dissent that is often magnified by social media, embarked on the most intense crackdown on independent groups in recent times”.

In the section headlined, “Bangladesh: Government Shuts Down Critics”, the report says, “Several commuters were killed or injured during violence that erupted during some Bangladeshi opposition blockades of transport routes.”

“The government, led by Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, became increasingly authoritarian, with security forces arresting key opposition leaders, often on trumped up charges, and state authorities refusing to prosecute security forces for serious violations, including torture, killings, and enforced disappearances.”

“There is no effective political opposition in parliament because the main parties chose not to participate, but now the Sheikh Hasina government seems determined to stem all dissenting voices – even outside the parliament,” says Brad Adams, the Watch’s Asia Director.

“It is terrible that when bloggers were murdered, the government could only preach self-censorship.”

Critics of Human Rights Watch say it repeatedly focuses on political and civil rights while ignoring social and economic rights. As a result, it routinely judges nations throughout the world in a manner that furthers capitalist values and discredits governments seeking socialist alternatives.

In 2015, the NGO in its world report says, five bloggers with atheist sympathies were hacked to death by extremist groups.

“Other bloggers, writers, and publishers, whose names were published on a hit-list, went into hiding, concerned that government protection was either absent or at best inadequate. A Shia procession and a Hindu temple faced serious attacks, with many wounded.

“Members of the opposition Jamaat-e-Islami and Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) said they feared arbitrary arrest or extrajudicial killings.

Citing the case of BNP spokesperson Salahuddin Ahmed which it claims is “emblematic of the seriousness of the crackdown on opposition”, the NGO continues, the politician “was abducted in Dhaka on March 10, 2015.

“In May, Ahmed was found in India and charged by Indian authorities with illegal entry. Witnesses reported that Ahmed was detained by security forces in Dhaka, but the government failed to investigate their role in this and other alleged disappearances of opposition members.

“Civil society and media faced harsh conditions. Forty-nine people were prosecuted for expressing public support for another journalist’s right to publish fair criticism of war crimes trials.

“Media critical of the government continued to face closure, as editors and journalists faced charges and arrest. Two men were prosecuted for social media posts criticizing the government.

“Following final death sentences for two men found guilty of war crimes in 1971, the government shuttered several social media applications, including Facebook.

“Many of the problems we highlighted last year remain in place this year, and in some cases are much worse,” says Adams.

“It has been a long time since the fundamental rights of expression, assembly, and religion have been recognized and protected in Bangladesh.”

But the HRW terms government efforts to increase support for labour rights in the readymade garment industry as “a positive development”.

These “seemed to be having an impact, with a rise in the number of labor unions registered, although concerns remain about the capacity of workers to form and participate freely in labour unions”.