Apart from pointing out the faults in the investigation, the top law officer of the state who had argued in the war crimes case has also questioned the competence of the prosecutors.
Bangladesh's highest appeals court on Wednesday watered down the death sentence, given by the war crimes tribunal, of top Jamaat-e-Islami leader Sayedee to ‘imprisonment until death’.
Expressing frustration, the War Crimes Fact Finding Committee had also openly blamed the prosecution's failure to present facts and evidence for the reduced sentence.
In his immediate reaction, committee convener MA Hassan told bdnews24.com despite having enough evidence, the prosecution’s presentation in court in Sayedee's case was poor.
At a talk-show on Wednesday night on private Ekattor TV, Mahbubey Alam blamed the ICT investigators' negligence.
He also brought up their failure in collecting documents of the FIR over the murder of Ibrahim Kutti filed by his wife.
He said, "Investigators did not find the documents of the FIR filed by Ibrahim Kutti's wife."
"The FIR of (Kutti’s wife) that Sayedee's lawyer presented in court did not have Sayedee's name. But the tribunal's investigation did not find it. They don't even know whether there are any ongoing cases against Sayedee based on those documents or if his name had come up later."
Haque said both them and the attorney general himself had failed to collect the case documents.
"He (Alam) had gone to Barisal, Pirojpur to find those documents, he didn't get them, right? Police officials of those districts also said that they did not find such documents."
In his response, Attorney General Alam said, "I think this document existed. We couldn't find it maybe because someone hid it. This is completely the result of a lack in coordination."
After the verdict, Chief Coordinator of the ICT prosecution's investigation arm Abdul Hannan had told reporters, "We also hoped that Sayedee's death sentence will hold. But that didn't happen. There's nothing to say about the Supreme Court's verdict."
But Sanaul Haque was not ready to concede so easily. "The prosecutors were supposed to point out any lacking when the investigating team submitted its report to the tribunal. And now we are being blamed after the verdict."
"We always asked them (prosecutors) to tell us if we had been negligent in anyway."
At this point, the attorney general questioned the skills of the prosecutors as well as their physical fitness. He also brought to the fore the bickering between prosecutors.
Alam, a former president of the Supreme Court Bar Association, said, "You would be shocked if you heard about some incidents that occurred at the tribunal. An individual without any experience of handling even one criminal case was appointed as one of the prosecutors."